Do or Don't: DI

I chose to look at DI for my reading program eval. I was glad that I did because I didn't really know much about DI apart from quick undergraduate observations and gripes from colleagues. I was surprised to find that there are a lot of research studies that support it. However, really looking at DI and comparing it to the guidelines, it's obvious that it can't measure up.

"Getting things done is not always what is most important. There is value in allowing others to learn, even if the task is not accomplished as quickly, efficiently, or effectively." --R.D. Clyde

I think DI focuses too much on getting to the answers that the process of trying, making mistakes, and learning is overlooked. The advocates of DI are proud of its fast pace. What students may learn is that efficiency and superficiality trumps sincere experimentation. There is a joy in being able to take time to work through and soak up knowledge that DI denies them.